An argument in favor of animal experimentation

Human subject may withdraw consent at any time if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible. Crossley [ audiovideo ] Craig makes his own well-developed case for the Resurrection of Jesus, and then there is some good historical back-and-forth between the two.

This leads him to the view that it may be morally permissible to eat animals who have been raised and slaughtered humanely. As long as Simon has had a fair opportunity to develop his mathematical abilities, using Jane's "intelligence" as a criterion for determining the distribution of the particular resource in question educational benefits is fair.

Most ethicists think that we have a greater moral responsibility for the things we do than for the things we fail to do; i.

Stop Adding Zeroes

He was particularly enamored of poi, the fermented taro preparation of the South Sea Islanders. However, we look upon past examples of this behavior as morally condemnable. But the argument is about whether the experiments are morally right or wrong. While I acknowledge that technical skills in biology and statistics are entirely different from knowledge of morality and ethics, I nevertheless maintain that a competent scientist is zealous about both technical and ethical concerns.

All foodstuff of animal origin contains oestradiol, which is at least 10,fold more potent than most xenoestrogens, and dietary exposure—meat, dairy products and eggs—to these natural sex steroids is therefore highly relevant since the hormones in these animals are identical to our own.

Physicians are often curious about details of how some disease or disorder progresses e. In the largest study to date higher levels of cholesterol in the blood was associated with a significantly lower percentage of normal sperm. This essay supports animal rights.

Draper [ audio ] Draper makes a semi-weak case for naturalism, which Craig further weakens. Actually, Davis is much kinder to the Paleo movement than many critics are.

And on the third level of theory--the macro-level--rights theory allows for incremental change. He certainly lost it on logic, though he probably won on rhetoric and organization as he always does.

Scruton also makes a distinction between wild animals and those we have made dependent on us. These may involve the use of animal models of diseases or conditions, which are often discovered or generated by pure research programmes.

Government, some of it done by famous physicians. As long as an animal's interests receive equitable consideration consideration untainted by the speciesism that discounts animal interests simply because they are the interests of a supposed "inferior"Singer's equality principle is satisfied.

So, in this sense, Singer's long-term goal is arguably more progressive than the traditional welfarist approach as long as everyone agrees how to describe competing interests, and also agrees how to weigh those interests in light of the assessment of consequences--and agreement about such matters is not easy to achieve.

Although a moral community could theoretically include animals, it frequently does not. Here, an animal is treated so that it develops pathology and symptoms that resemble a human disease.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

As far as I can tell, he has won nearly all his debates with atheists. So, there can be considerable controversy as to whether the horse's mental capacities, which differ from those of the human, will result in more overall suffering by the horse, who may be terrified to a considerable degree for a short period of time as the result of the blow, or the human, who may not only experience the pain, but who may experience anxiety over a longer period of time, or who, as a result of different mental capacities, may anticipate another blow or be more distressed by the blow because of memories of physical abuse suffered earlier.

The most notable medications developed through animal testing include penicillin, insulin, and the polio vaccine. Physicians claim each patient gave "oral consent", but a material fact was not disclosed to patient and many of the patients were not in a physical or mental condition to give valid consent.

And herein lies what is perhaps the most important difference between rights theory and welfare theory for purposes of applying either to concrete situations.

This would necessitate complete abolition of those forms of animal exploitation that are dependent upon the status of animals as human property.

My critics will respond that every movement achieves rights incrementally. It is not acceptable to cause injury to a subject just to study the response to the injury.

Further, before the judge approved the settlement inthe state's attorney had an ex parte meeting with the judge, at which the attorney falsely represented that source of the drug was the Army Medical Corps, to give the impression that the experiment was therapeutic.Sex steroid hormones in meat, eggs, and dairy may help explain the link between saturated fat intake and declining sperm counts.

NOTE: This was originally supposed to be a guest post for Kris Gunnars' Authority Nutrition website, but in true Denise Minger fashion, the word count got out of control and we decided to dock it here instead.

Philosophy and Animals

Voila! Just pretend you're reading this on a blog far, far away, and that, for once in my life. Related source: and Human population control is the practice of artificially altering the rate of growth of a human population.

Historically, human population control has been implemented by limiting the population's birth rate, usually by government mandate, and has been undertaken as a response to factors including high or increasing levels of poverty, environmental concerns, religious.

Described by Jeffrey Masson as 'the single best introduction to animal rights ever written,' this new book by Tom Regan will structure the animal rights debate for generations to come.

The Design Argument: Answers to Atheists' Objections

Improvements in medicine and surgery during the last two centuries have greatly extended the average lifetime of people and reduced the pain and disability following various injuries and diseases.

Because medicine and surgery have a strong basis in scientific knowledge, it is absolutely necessary for medical progress that there be experiments on humans.

Wild animal welfare: a bibliography

The dozens of organizations using animals – ranging from monkeys to actual guinea pigs – as the basis for experimentation serve as a reminder that most of us indirectly support the practice, not only at the grocery store, but also in the voting booth.

Download
An argument in favor of animal experimentation
Rated 4/5 based on 50 review